You’ve seen what AI can do. Getting it working inside your business is a different job.
Kyznflow is an AI automation agency. We design, build and maintain automations shaped around your processes and the tools you already run. Nothing goes live until it’s proven against your real scenarios, and we keep improving it as your business changes.
Customer onboarding systemClient hub, Halden AdvisoryWelcome, OrlaContract signedPortal access set upKick-off: Thursday, 10:00Sent the day the contract was signed
Inbound lead response systemWebsite enquiry to booked callProcess call bookedTHU10:00Thursday, 10:0030-minute video callEnquiry answered and qualifiedInvite in both diaries
GTM outbound systemBuying signals to a hot leadWrenmoor HomesPricing page09:12Job post11:40Topic surge14:05CRM dataHot leadSend reportBook a callSend email
Proposals and tenders systemDrafted from the sales callFernhill ResearchSurvey programme 2027Four surveys, two board reportsLive in six weeksFixed price$12,400
Connected data systemFour tools, one clean recordPennant RecruitmentHubSpotXeroStripeSmartSurveyOne viewDealsInvoicesSurvey scoresDuplicates merged automatically
LinkedIn outreach systemLinkedIn reply, passed to youJordan HaleFirst message sentMonConnection acceptedTueReplied: happy to talkWedCall booked with youThu
Invoices and payments systemInvoice sent, paid, reconciledINV-2048Mallory Street TrainingSurvey programme, Q3$4,000Board report$800$4,800PaidPaid by card link, matched in Xero
Survey data campaign systemBenchmark report, one per clientYour benchmark, Q3Response rateSatisfactionRenewal intentYouSector average
Personalised content systemRenewal due, video made and sentFor Ana, Harbour GuildYour renewal, in 90 seconds
Two-way sync systemOne contact, the same in every toolNiamh CarterLarkfield Dental GroupSalesforceupdatedQuickBooksupdatedQualtricsupdatedChanged once, updated everywhere
A B2B company where the founder or CEO is still close to the work. You run on tools like HubSpot, Stripe and Slack, and at least one spreadsheet held together with hope. Growth is going well, which is exactly why the admin is getting worse.
Who we are.
Strategy and planningBuildQualityOngoing improvementOne point of contactJudgement
A deliberately small automation agency. The person you meet on the process call stays your point of contact through the design, the build and every change after launch.
Ryan, who leads Kyznflow, came to automation from B2B marketing, with a revenue number over his head. Commercial thinking comes first, then the build.
How we work
We work with you to understand what you need, audit your processes and tools so we can then plan the improvements. From there we connect your systems and data and then build the workflows your business needs.
Process & ToolsAuditGap AnalysisProcess LogicStrategyBuildYour tools and dataCRMInboxCall recordingsSpreadsheetsSurvey dataPaymentsThe logic we designExtractSortPrioritiseDe-dupeResearchBrand guidelinesCreateReconcileValidateDecideHold backHuman in the loopSome cases go to a personYour changes, built inWhat you getProposalFernhill ResearchFixed price$12,400Sales proposalConnected data78%Key findings14Live surveys2,318ResponsesYour sector, 2026Campaign analytics &Survey reportsFor Ana, Harbour GuildYour renewal, in 90 secondsPersonal videoAccount ManagementQuality ControlAdd FeaturesMonitor and ImproveProcess & ToolsAuditGapAnalysisProcessLogicStrategyBuildYour tools and dataCRMInboxCall recordingsSpreadsheetsSurvey dataPaymentsThe logic we designExtractSortPrioritiseDe-dupeResearchBrand guidelinesCreateReconcileValidateDecideHold backHuman in the loopSome cases go to a personYour changes, built inWhat you getProposalFernhill ResearchFixed price$12,400Sales proposalConnected data78%Key findings14Live surveys2,318ResponsesYour sector, 2026Campaign analytics &Survey reportsFor Ana, Harbour GuildYour renewal, in 90 secondsPersonal videoAccountManagementQualityControlAddFeaturesMonitor andImprove
We start by mapping your tools, data and processes. That shows where the gaps and bottlenecks are, and which steps carry the most risk and need the tightest controls. The plan is drawn up for review before anything is built.
We connect to your existing tools and standardise the processes and data around them, so clean, correct information flows both ways between them.
How you make each decision is written down and built in, so the system applies your standards the same way every time, including the exceptions.
A person stays involved wherever you choose, and when the system is unsure it asks.
Every output is built from your own data and checked against your standards before it goes out. That includes documents, reports, dashboards, videos, the data itself and more.
After launch, every system is monitored. If something breaks, we know before you do and fix it.
Whatever software you use, we can connect it.
We connect your tools and platforms, clean and standardise the data scattered across them, and keep it moving both ways, so every system works from the same information. If a tool’s plan limits what can be connected, we find out before anything is built.
Kyznflow
SmartSurvey
n8n
Salesforce
QuestionPro
Stripe
Jotform
Fathom
Microsoft Excel
Jira
Trello
Fireflies
Power BI
Airtable
Microsoft Teams
ChatGPT
Zoom
Asana
Mailchimp
Shopify
Claude
Google Calendar
Gmail
PayPal
Xero
Microsoft Outlook
SurveyMonkey
Apollo
Make
Intercom
Notion
Instantly
OneDrive
Google Docs
Typeform
PandaDoc
Miro
Sage
Box
ActiveCampaign
Webflow
Calendly
Monday.com
Google Analytics
Dropbox
Zapier
Google Forms
Meta
DocuSign
Confluence
Google Meet
Lovable
Zendesk
Pipedrive
Zoho
Perplexity
Qualtrics
Slack
Google Drive
Twilio
Gemini
ClickUp
WordPress
WhatsApp
Loom
LinkedIn
Eventbrite
Google Sheets
QuickBooks
HubSpot
Systems and workflows we’ve built
Every one of these started as a process call.
Integration
Data silos into one connected, two-way flow
The same customer sits in the CRM, the survey platform, the finance tool and a spreadsheet, each holding its own version. This system connects them: one clean record, with every change sent back to every tool in both directions. Duplicates are merged, conflicts go to a person to decide which record wins, and the dashboards and scheduled reports draw from the clean record only. Your team keeps working in the tools they know, and the numbers agree with each other.
Data silos
CRMA change in either place updates the other
Survey platform
Finance
Spreadsheets
Web analytics
Ad data
Partner and affiliate data
Seven tools, seven versions of the same customer
One connected flow
One clean recordDe-duped, reconciled, validated
Conflict?
You pick the record that wins
What comes out
Attribution: which channel and which partner produced each deal
Conversion: where leads drop, by source, so spend moves to what works
Affiliate and partner reporting: performance and payouts from one record
Sales data: pipeline and customer records correct in every tool
Revenue by sourceOrganicPaidPartnerOutbound
Onboarding
New client set-up and communication system
When a deal closes, the system creates the accounts, builds a personalised hub for each stakeholder, sends the welcome pack, books the kick-off, and keeps every participant informed as the engagement runs. Reminders go out with the right message for how far along each one is. Decisions that need a person get a deadline and a safe fallback, and only one named person holds the buttons that change a date. Built for two survey businesses; the same rails now run their other product lines.
A full outbound system, built the way a senior go-to-market hire would build it. It starts with the target and the signals: role, company size, hiring, funding, the tools they use, and what their own website shows about how they work. Lists are built and enriched across more than one data source, so a contact isn’t dropped because one provider had a gap, then scored and prioritised. Every email is written from research on that company, about the single strongest thing it found. Sending runs on separate domains with warmed mailboxes, a daily limit per mailbox, rotation across the pool and varied wording on every send (spintax), so the campaign never puts your main domain at risk. Every reply is read and routed: interest reaches you within minutes, questions go to the right person, a no is honoured for good. Every send, reply and outcome is logged against the record, so you can see which signals, segments and messages convert and change the next campaign accordingly.
Research
Defines the target and the signalsRole, size, hiring, funding, tools, website
Builds and enriches the listMore than one data source
Worth your time?Scored and prioritised before any research
Reads the whole websiteEvery page, not the homepage
Writing and sending
Evidence strong enough?If not, the company is skipped
Writes three sentencesAbout the one thing it found
Automation that sends the wrong thing under your name costs more than it saves. So before we build, we work out what must never happen and write the rules in. These are from systems running now:
It never pitches someone you already know. Before any LinkedIn request goes out, it checks your connections, your past conversations and your CRM. Three separate checks, because a cold pitch to someone you know costs a relationship.
When someone says no, that’s final. One no removes the person from every sequence on every channel, permanently. Nobody on your team has to remember.
A real buyer never talks to a bot. When a reply shows interest or asks a question, the automation stops and the conversation reaches you within minutes. Anything it can’t read with confidence goes to a person too.
It won’t claim what it can’t back up. In tender and proposal responses, every statement is checked against your own documentation and live research, then given a confidence grade. Where the fit is poor, it recommends declining.
A statistic that’s stopped being true doesn’t get sent. Every figure in a campaign email has conditions attached. The system re-tests them before each send and holds the email if the data has moved.
Nothing goes out pointing at a page that isn’t live. Before an email with a link is sent, the system confirms the page exists. If it doesn’t, the email waits and a person gets the exact fix.
Only the right person can change the plan. Dates, closures and approvals sit behind one named person with a confirmation step. Colleagues see the update; they can’t trigger it by accident.
If something breaks, we know before you do. Every build reports a failure the moment it happens, with what broke, why, and the fix, to us.
None of these come built into a tool. They exist because we asked, before building, what must never happen, and then wrote the rule. That’s the difference between an automation and a system you can put your name to.
About the AI part
You don’t need a position on AI to use any of this. We use it where it earns its keep: reading a call transcriptA written record of everything said on a call, made automatically from the recording., drafting a proposal, personalising an email at scale. Everywhere else it’s plain automationFixed steps that run the same way every time, like moving a new payment into your accounts. No AI involved. that does the same thing correctly every time. Where AI does make a call, rules run first, and anything ambiguous goes to a person rather than being guessed at.
There’s nothing for your team to learn or manage, and nothing goes near your live systemsThe tools your team and clients use every day. New work is built and tested away from them first. until it’s proven. Then you judge it the way you’d judge a new hire: is the work getting done, and is it getting done well.
StrategyMonitor and improveReading a calltranscriptDrafting aproposalYou approvePlain automationAI, only where it earns its keepA person at the checkpoint
Agreed in writing before we build
If you’re new here, it’s fair to ask why you should trust a small agency with your operations. So before anything is built, we agree in writing what the system must do, on which real data, and what good enough looks like. The build is tested against that before it goes live, and you see the results.
What the system must do
On which real data
Good enough
What good enough looks like
Agreed in writingBuildMeasured against it
What happens after you book a process call
The process call
Thirty minutes on the process that costs you most. You leave with a prioritised list of what’s worth automating, whether we work together or not.
The plan, on paper
You see the whole system before anything is built: every trigger, every step, every point where a person decides. We agree in writing what it must do and what good enough looks like.
Build and test
Built around the tools you already run and tested on your real scenarios before it goes live. Simple builds take 4 to 10 days, complex ones 14 to 28.
Go live
The system runs in your own accounts, under your logins. Your team keeps working in the tools they already use. Nothing new to learn.
The first 30 days
Fixes, adjustments and prompt changes are included. After that, ongoing support is included in the Automation Partner package.
Software makes you adapt your process to fit the tool. We build around the process and tools you already have, so nothing changes about how your team works. The repetitive parts are what go away.
What’s it built on?
n8n or Make as the automation layer, depending on what fits, connected to your existing stack. You never touch either one. If something needs adjusting, a template, a scoring rule, a step, we handle it. We’re not tied to any one platform. We pick n8n, Make or direct code per build, after checking what each tool’s plan allows.
What happens if something breaks?
Every build ships with error handling, so failures notify us immediately. For the first 30 days after go-live we fix anything as part of the project. After that, anything caused by our build gets fixed free. Changes caused by an external tool updating its API fall under ongoing support, and we’re clear upfront about which is which.
What does it cost?
Three options: Project, Automation Partner or Rescue. Projects from $5,495 USD, Automation Partner from $3,995 USD per month, and Rescue from $2,895 USD. The price depends on what’s being automated and how complex it is, and you get a transparent estimate at the process call. Companies with several processes to automate are usually better serviced by the Automation Partner package.
Couldn’t we build this ourselves in Claude Code or Codex?
For a one-off script or a personal productivity task, yes, and we’ll say so on the process call. We use the same tools inside our builds. What a tool can’t do is decide what’s worth automating, set the standard the output has to meet, or own the system when a tool changes underneath it. That job lands on someone, usually the founder. If you’ve already built something yourself, Rescue covers a second opinion.
Who owns the system?
You do. Everything is built in your accounts, under your name: the workflows, the logins, the data. We manage it for you. If we ever parted ways, you’d keep all of it.
How are you different from other automation agencies and freelancers?
Three things you can check rather than take on trust. The decisions: every system on this page shows the rules it applies, and you’ll see yours in the diagram before we build. The output: we write what flows through the system, the email, the proposal, the report, to a standard a B2B buyer accepts. And durability: ask any agency whether their builds are still running six months on. Ours are, in the clients’ own accounts, and they’ve grown since launch.
What won’t you automate?
Decisions that need context and relationships, complex negotiations, and anywhere a human touch is your advantage. Some creative work too; current AI creative tools are built for consumer products, and the output doesn’t meet the bar B2B work needs. If your process is one of these, we’ll tell you on the call.